Search for: "Stock v. Stock"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 8,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 6:21 am
In Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:34 pm
The Fifth Circuit, in Kirschbaum v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
That’s something courts have been concerned about for quite some time – for instance, here’s a quote from the 1st Circuit’s 1992 decision in Milton v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:15 am
One of the other lawyers made a comment about common stock and common shares, and the accountant made the correction and then smiled and said something about how only lawyers care. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 7:37 pm
In Gradient OC Master Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 9:18 am
James V. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:08 pm
This ruling was based upon the 1983 Supreme Court decision, Dirks v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:25 am
The stockholder fraud claim fails because he didn’t allege that he purchased Twitter stock. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:09 am
Holdings Inc. v Barclays Bank PLC, 151 AD3d 108, 117 [1st Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 919 [2017]). [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:06 am
Although the Mac v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:29 am
The more likely explanation for a puzzling turn of events, in which an analyst at the bank issued a recommendation to buy a stock at $7 and the bank announced that evening that it would act as the placing agent for an offering of the same stock at $6, was that the conflict had simply slipped past the bank’s compliance systems (Prodanova v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:21 pm
The SEC found that the adviser’s late-afternoon trades were intended to mark the close in order to reflect higher portfolio balances in clients’ monthly account statements (Koch v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:23 am
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:50 am
Dodge v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
The IPO proved a disaster and left the reputations of the banks, the Amsterdam stock exchange and the company itself tarnished. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 12:21 pm
Quaglia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:04 am
Norwitz, Sabastian V. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
Dukes and Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
