Search for: "Strain v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 1,920
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2010, 4:12 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:48 pm
" Kloster Speedsteel AB v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
- ‘indirect consumer tax’ to fund UN public health initiatives (Afro-IP) Canada: Submissions on Canada-EU trade deal: Canadian Generic Pharma Assoc. wants IP out (Michael Geist) Canada: Intellectual property and agriculture – CDC Triffid seed story (ipblog.ca) EU: Records of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd expert meetings on SPCs (The SPC Blog) EU: Cooperation between Board of Appeal and National Court / acceleration of appeal proceedings: Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly (EPLAW)… [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
If the taxpayer anticipates “selling’ a property to complete the exchange, the taxpayer must acquire a property that is otherwise qualified and within Code §1031, as stated, above. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
" Stalley v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
New York is in the minority of states that has not adopted RUPA. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:42 am
Like its federal counterpart, Maryland Rule of Evidence 5-704(b) states that An expert witness testifying with respect to the mental state or condition of a defendant in a criminal case may not state an opinion or inference as to whether... [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:22 am
" Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:44 am
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr questions the vitality of Kyllo v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 11:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:41 am
., v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552, and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:58 pm
(I have taken the quote directly from Berger v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Montgomery County v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 10:02 am
In an outbreak involving Cargill subsidiary, Excel Meats, The Wisconsin Supreme Court in Kriefall v Excel called it as it saw it: “The E. coli strain that killed Brianna and made the others sick is a “deleterious substance which may render [meat] injurious to health. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Even as long ago as 1980 we felt it proper to 599 "assume" that unlawful police behavior would "be dealt with appropriately" by the authorities, United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 2:44 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
McLaughlin v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
The case of Lau v. [read post]
