Search for: "T. Roberts"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 36,578
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 2:49 pm
Odds are he won’t be the one spending three days in jail on a warrant for a different and crack-dealing John Roberts, but another member of this cohort very well might. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm
Chief Justice Roberts authored the majority opinion, which Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett joined. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:04 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, which ruled that the emergency power the Biden administration cited—the 2003 HEROES Act—”does not authorize” the Education Department’s debt cancellation program. *** Read more… [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
” The Court didn’t foreclose all efforts by universities to apply more than mechanical admissions standards. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
” The Court didn’t foreclose all efforts by universities to apply more than mechanical admissions standards. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:39 pm
The decision below, like the decision in Roberts v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am
” “Disagreement,” Waggoner continued, “isn’t discrimination, and the government can’t mislabel speech as discrimination to censor it. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
S., at 548 (ROBERTS, C. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
They don't say "critical mass," for whatever reason, but the idea is still there.Here's Justice Sotomayor:The Court goes as far as to claim that Bakke’s recognition that Black Americans can offer different perspectives than white people amounts to a “stereotype. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
” In 2006, Roberts added: “It is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
By Robert I. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal How Judges Navigate Offers of Free Lunch, Trips and NBA Tickets Bloomberg Law – Zoe Tillman (Bloomberg News) | Published: 6/25/2023 Recent controversies over perks accepted by Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have raised questions not only about the justices’ conduct off the bench and what they disclose to the public, but also about how the judiciary broadly enforces ethics. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:29 am
What this refers to, isn’t entirely clear. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
That was a conspicuous omission in the majority opinion, that Roberts didn’t even allude to the question of the benefits of affirmative action for the society. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
And, as Roberts and Gorsuch effectively explain, that rationale is so full of holes that it can't possibly pass muster under the "strict scrutiny" imposed on the use of racial classifications. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:36 am
As the opinion for the Court by Chief Justice Roberts puts it: University programs must comply with strict scrutiny, they may never use race as a stereotype or negative, and—at some point—they must end. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
When it comes to race, however, the Chief ain't evolving. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]