Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE" Results 1661 - 1680 of 5,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
Or consider the somewhat obscure but incredibly important United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
 However it was refiled in 2005 after, according to plaintiffs, the defendants started spreading rumors about them in churches around the state. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Judge Kozinski ate a sandwich paid for by the ACLU and the National Law Journal and American Bar Association are totally on it; Update: “Ohio court says city can’t use ‘quick-take’ to seize property” [Watchdog, earlier on town of Perrysburg’s effort to seize property in adjoining Middleton Township] Regarding the wildly one-sided attacks on arbitration of late, I’ve noticed that the people who call contractually agreed-to arbitration… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/5FwuTQfV7i -> US states vow to fight Google after the FTC meekly rolls over http://t.co/05SSbWyR2F -> [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:58 am by Lisa S. Charbonneau
Indeed, Labor Code section 220(b) states that numerous key sections of the Labor Code do not apply to “employees directly employed by any county, incorporated city, or town or other municipal corporation. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:03 pm by Michael DelSignore
This type of defense based on the territorial jurisdiction of the officer could arise from an officer entering a neighboring town or when an officer crosses state borders. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Because plaintiff did not set forth that contention in the amended complaint or in the bill of particulars, or otherwise raise the issue in Supreme Court, that contention is not properly before us (see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 985). [read post]