Search for: "The People v. Jones" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am by Guest Blogger
 A clue may be found in a single sentence from the Supreme Court’s pivotal Jones & Laughlin Steel decision upholding the National Labor Relations Act against both commerce clause and liberty of contract claims. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am by Guest Blogger
It has been nearly 40 years since the Court in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm by Rick
Jones, 18 Cal.4th at 682, quoting People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 3 March 2017 the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Lloyd-Jones and McCombe LJJ) gave judgment in the important data protection case of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Company Ltd & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 121. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the court made no such finding here, and instead, improperly delegated the parenting time determination to the father, the error required reversalIn Matter of C.M. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:54 am
  (15 Minutes Per Side)  March 6, 2007    2  06-5777    Peoples Bank & Trust v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6054, Jones v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The extension of the breach of confidence action The case of Douglas v Hello! [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a similar vein, Equifax has been fined £500,000 by the ICO (the press release can be found here and Equifax’s response here) for its failure to protect the personal data of over 15 million people in the UK following a breach in 2017. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The rationale for the “meet and confer” requirement was discussed in depth in the NPD of Jones (Robert) v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On the 6 December 2016 Channel 4 News has issued an apology after a subtitling error wrongly claimed Boris Johnson had discussed whether “people of colour” should be allowed into the UK, in reality, Johnson said he was in favour of having “people of talent” come to the UK, and did not discuss race. [read post]