Search for: "Thomas v. Heard" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins and David Hudson
In the 56 First Amendment free speech cases the court heard between 2005 and 2020, the court was unanimous nearly a third of the time, while a 5-4 division occurred a quarter of the time. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing remains outstanding: El Diwany v Ministry of Justice & the Police, Norway, heard 16 March 2011 (Sharp J). [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:27 am by SHG
Until this week, only Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for himself, had ever invoked any aspect of Bush v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am by Victoria Kwan
“I will answer it in a different way, which is – I think that this is the time where every good person has an obligation both to continue being heard and continue doing the right thing. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 12:17 pm by Florian Mueller
I just wrote about it in the previous post (the first one of a series of three posts on FTC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Neff and the aforementioned Thomas, as well as the Luzerne County case Wissinger v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The government’s attack on the Carlin recitation led to the most important constitutional ruling so far on broadcast “indecency” — the Court’s 1978 decision in FCC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
” March On March 26, the justices heard oral argument in the two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Rucho v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm by Will Baude
[Todd Henderson on the legal status of Eastern Oklahoma] Last year, the Supreme Court heard arguments, and requested extensive supplemental briefing, in Royal v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am by Graeme Hall
Proportionate for PCT to adopt “exceptional circumstances” test without reference to personal characteristics – see Adam Wagner’s post Thomas & Ors v Bridgend County Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 862 (26 July 2011): Decision to build new road close to claimants’ homes and subsequent depreciation in value breached their human rights to peaceful enjoyment of property – see David Hart QC’s post. [read post]