Search for: "U.S. v. Promin"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
Involvement in Prominent Litigation Despite the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
Involvement in Prominent Litigation Despite the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
Involvement in Prominent Litigation Despite the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
Involvement in Prominent Litigation Despite the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
When Griggs v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
But to my knowledge, not a single prominent U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:44 am
The case pitted the American Public Health Association v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
The decision has already been appealed, and the plaintiffs are seeking expedited review in the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
” Citizens United, 558 U.S. at 352. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 5:37 pm
The most important judicial opinion to date concerning the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:27 am
It was a rather prominent feature of Justice Scalia's dissent in one of the abortion protest injunction cases, Madsen v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:48 am
The current CASL legislation, regulations and guidelines are as follows: (i) CASL legislation; (ii) CRTC Regulations; (iii) Industry Canada Regulations; (iv) Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement; and (v) CRTC Information Bulletins. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 5:13 pm
Both are among the most prominent originalist scholars in America, and their book sounds extremely interesting; here is a summary: Originalism holds that the U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
On Friday, the U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
For the last year or so, the law has required a sizable chunk of U.S. video programming displayed on the Internet to be closed captioned. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
” Touby v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
” Bailey v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:19 am
Ed. 2d 500 (U.S. 2011) (internal quotations and citations omitted). [read post]
