Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA" Results 1661 - 1680 of 6,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2012, 7:14 am
The Department of Justice announced that the United States has partially intervened in a qui tam action pending in the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court made this ruling in a 7-2 decision in the case of Jerman v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 1:06 pm
Va. could have subject matter jurisdiction over a claim under a Florida consumer protection statute, notwithstanding the reference in the statute to bringing suit in state court. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:36 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  It seems that the healthcare aspect of Florida v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm by Daniel Barry
On January 2, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (“Tenth Circuit”) denied the State of Oklahoma’s motion for a stay pending appeal to the United States Supreme Court and one week later transferred jurisdiction back to the district court[1] regarding Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
This scheme appears at odds with the [United States Supreme Court’s] observation that ‘defendants who do not kill, intend to kill, or foresee that life will be taken are categorically less deserving of the most serious forms of punishment than are murderers. . . . [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 1:25 pm by Xi Lucy Shi
United States that “serious drug offense” requires only that the state offense involve the conduct specified in the statute; it does not require that the state offense match certain generic offenses. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 10:17 am by Larry
The second recent Court of International Trade decision of interest primarily to lawyers is United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
But in 1990, the Court struck down that law as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:16 pm
It is not often that a court precludes the government from using a cache of firearms, including an assault rifle, and 16,000 rounds of ammunition in a drug trafficking case, but in United States v. [read post]