Search for: "US v. London"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2018, 2:33 am
EssaysWas the Supreme Court right in Actavis v Eli Lilly to introduce a doctrine of equivalents when determining infringement of patents in the UK? [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:04 am
The event will be held on 23 January 2020 from 6pm to 8pm at Bristows LLP, 100 Victoria Embankment, EC4Y 0DH, London. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
* * *What follows is intended to help us see precisely why the recent California Coastal Commission meeting made a complete mockery and mess of representative democracy, at least in the Millian sense.As Nadia Urbinati[1] well explains, J.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
This is apparently verified by recent developments in London, venue for so many commercial disputes. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 3:50 pm
But there also are some mild surprises here: for example, the stirring defense of the rights of Tina Bennis, the Michigan woman’s whose share (with her husband) in the ownership of a used car was taken away because the husband used the car as the scene of a sex encounter with a prostitute — a forfeiture upheld by the Supreme Court in Bennis v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm
See generally the non-exhaustive list of factors set out in the judgment of Scott Baker J in R (Khan) v London Borough of Newham [2001] EWHC Admin 589 at paragraphs 8 to 14. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
See also Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:09 am
So, without further ado…Ayres and others v Roberts and othersIn All’s Well That Ends Well (Act.1, Scene 1), Shakespeare urges us to “love all, trust a few. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 4:51 am
McKerr v United Kingdom, at para. 111). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:09 am
So, without further ado…Ayres and others v Roberts and othersIn All’s Well That Ends Well (Act.1, Scene 1), Shakespeare urges us to “love all, trust a few. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 7:08 am
However, there is little doubt that, if this were to have been a matter of US v EU (as opposed to EU v US), the US would be breaking down the EU's door.I have seen criticism of the ban by UK officials:Britain's culture secretary on Friday compared the U.S. crackdown on online gambling to the failed alcohol ban of Prohibition as she prepared to host an international summit on Internet gambling next week. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but a few resolved cases: Richard Jones v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Levy & McRae Solicitors, on behalf of Christopher and Mary Gorman v The Sun, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Mr Dean Torkington v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Dr Helen Hammond v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Basim Shamsuddin v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 19/03/2013; Noveprim Group… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Old Cinema, University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, London W1. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am
The “Angry Mob” goes on to point out that English Defence League had picked up the story and used it as evidence “that foreigners (read: Muslims) were forcing more British culture to be abandoned“. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:09 pm
In d’Amico Dry d.a.c. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 12:15 am
Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:08 am
The items in question were on their way from Hong Kong to Colombia -- neither of which are countries within the European Union -- and it was during a brief transitory stop at London's Heathrow Airport that they were inspected and found to be fakes. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Anyway, the IPKat, Merpel and all the crew are at your disposal and look forward to sharing lots of news, views and fun with you in the four months that take us to the end of the year.After renaming the Patents County Court theIntellectual Property Enterprise Court, we nowhave a new name for the Court of AppealThis Kat is furious that the Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in Lumos Skincare Limited v Sweet Squared Limited and others -- a decision that drew some… [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:43 am
But whatever happened to the original litigation in Brüstle v Greenpeace? [read post]
