Search for: "United States v. Am" Results 1661 - 1680 of 7,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2016, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
They have been invited to the likely final hearing for United States of America v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:29 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Second, it should serve an early interrogatory on the plaintiff that at least requires the plaintiff to respond first and embark on the task of identification. -- Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of CaliforniaOpinion Date: 11/18/11Cite: North American Lubricants Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
On October 10, 2017, I rejected the proffered plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Donald Thompson
 If you hear that an eye-witness is about to testify at trial and there has been no § 710.30 notice, but there was an identification procedure, move to preclude the testimony on § 710.30 grounds, as a violation of your client’s right to due process as protected by the New York State and United States constitutions, and on relevance grounds, because if the observation didn’t relate to your client, the testimony is not relevant. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by John Bellinger
Or should all of the detainees have been moved to detention facilities in the United States? [read post]