Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:44 pm by Ilya Somin
The event is being held around the two-year anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:10 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997)(quoting United States Judicial Conference Ad Hoc Committee on Asbestos Litigation). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
Jean PEARSON v the United Kingdom – 40957/07 [2011] ECHR 2319 (13 December 2011) January 4, 2012 European Court of Human Rights: State investigation into death of drug abuser with history of mental health problems was sufficient to satisfy Article 2 ECHR. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm by Ruth Levush
A colleague recently drew my attention to the proposition that "in the United States, the specter of class-action lawsuits imposes a higher level of precaution on the part of drug makers. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Conspirators in various locations throughout the United States (identity brokers) solicited customers. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am by Graeme Hall
European Court of Human Rights: State investigation into death of drug abuser with history of mental health problems was sufficient to satisfy Article 2 ECHR. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:02 am by Jeff Gamso
The country that has taken the place of the United States of America is a completely lawless country. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:06 pm by Heidi Meinzer
This would not be the first K-9 case in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Mensing, in which the United States Supreme Court couldn’t find a federal statute or regulation in support of granting generic drug manufacturers legal immunity and so contrived an argument the Court admitted “makes little sense,” or Garza v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by John Steele
Rogers, the United States Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment does not categorically require the state to provide counsel for all indigent parents facing a civil contempt hearing for non-payment of child support where the other parent is also not represented by counsel. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Entertainment Merchants Ass'n, 131 S.Ct. 2729 (2011)), videotaping animal cruelty (United States v. [read post]