Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2012, 3:39 pm
The Court may well look to the California Supreme Court’s Brinker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Oracle Corp., ___ Cal.4th ___ (Jun. 30, 2011), in which it addressed the UCL's extraterritorial reach: In this proceeding we address, at the request of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, questions about the applicability of California law to nonresident employees who work both here and in other states for a California-based employer. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:40 pm
United States Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:15 am
There are four criminal law decisions from the United States Supreme Court this morning:In McCoy v. [read post]
30 May 2020, 7:09 pm
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933). [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:59 am
Route 199 and State Route 197 in Del Norte County, California, near the Smith River. [read post]
Supreme Court Holds That PAGA Representative Waivers Are Enforceable In Certain Significant Respects
16 Jun 2022, 9:45 am
On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:04 pm
But at least 45 plaintiffs joined in a suit filed in California federal court in a case entitled Zhang v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Nelson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Nelson v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 8:14 am
” According to the United States Supreme Court, two things must occur before Miranda Rights attach; 1.) a custody and, 2.) an interrogation. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
Apple Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of California recently granted plaintiff Taction Technology, Inc. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
Apple Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of California recently granted plaintiff Taction Technology, Inc. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
Apple Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of California recently granted plaintiff Taction Technology, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm
See United States v. [read post]
