Search for: "United States v. Younge" Results 1661 - 1680 of 3,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
Young, 13-95 (asking whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am by Marty Lederman
 Barnette].So far, so good:  If the state compels an individual to actually say something that betrays her convictions--the classic case being the compulsion of the young Jehovah's Witness students in Barnette to attest their allegiance to the United States, contrary to their genuine beliefs--there's a First Amendment problem. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am by Anthony Gaughan
First and foremost, sports gambling is about to expand in the United States to an unprecedented extent. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 11:15 am by Lyle Denniston
The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
United States, in which the Justices will hear arguments next Monday. [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Over at The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reported on the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 4:25 pm
It continues only in brutal places like Iran, China - and, sadly, the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:35 am by lm27
In his book, Gordon Martin focuses on the lives and experiences of courageous black citizens of Forrest County, Mississippi who served as witnesses in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 4:46 am by Susan Brenner
It states defendants involved in such offenses `shall forfeit to the United States such person's interest in’ any visual depictions, proceeds obtained from such an offense, and `any property, real or personal, used or intended to be used to commit or promote the commission of such offense or any property traceable to such property. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:04 am
The majority opinion states in part that:A recent development suggests that the Supreme Court of the United States may soon revisit and address the application of the Eighth Amendment to claims that mental illness bars execution. [read post]