Search for: "Walters v State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 1,812
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2008, 3:25 pm
(Keeping with one of today’s themes, Umphrey mentioned cited Entergy v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:00 am
Seidenberg who resigned early this year and Walter V. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 3:31 pm
Today the Supreme Court delivered a disappointing decision in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
Fleming, Securing Constitutional Democracy (2006)Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (2006)Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (2006)Walter F. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:02 am
" A sad state of affairs. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:29 pm
C.A.A.F. has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 6:21 am
The decision was made by Judge Walter S. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 6:31 pm
See Yari v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:08 am
I now shamelessly crib from a lower court decision by Justice Walter Tolub in 2006 against Comptroller Hevesi and the State (citations have been omitted):It is well settled that the Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over actions for money damages against the State, State agencies, or State officials acting in their official capacities in the exercise of governmental functions. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 5:03 am
Indiana Electrical Workers Pension Trust Fund v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:41 pm
Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
We also represent a putative intervenor (the Catawba River Water Supply Project) in an original action, South Carolina v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
See McNellis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
Leaving are managing partner Walter Tache, partners Michael S. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
Watson, The Decay of "Divers" and the Future of charging "Under Divers Occasions" in Light of United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:04 am
But what was not similarly clear in the hearing on District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
Clement will argue for the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:31 pm
One is a short piece by two military judges discussing United States v. [read post]
