Search for: "White v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 1,739
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2008, 8:41 pm
The power is stricly limited, however, since the FISA rules state that there must be "no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:44 am
In this action Wilkinson and Casey asked the court to suppress evidence obtained by District Attorney's "White Collar Crime Unit" as the result of a search of their computers at the Village of North Syracuse Police Department on the grounds that they did not consent to the search and that the Search Warrant issued by the Onondaga County Court was issued without sufficient probable cause. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:46 am
Supreme Court held in Illinois Brick v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:51 pm
" This was therefore not a case like United States v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Discussion of Catherine Tremblay’s article on cost approach: (IP finance), US Congress cites free expression as reason ICANN must remain controlled by US government: (IP Justice), A new organisation around IP in your company? [read post]
22 May 2008, 8:01 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:22 pm
Sentencing Commission, 2007 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics Tables Sentencing Memorandum in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
This principle was established by the United States in one of the most dramatic of the post-World War II proceedings, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
"But where are the unitary executive proponents -- in the Administration and among the academic and other champions of Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
Department of State, moderator; Colette Rausch, U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:59 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:16 pm
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
It was also a victory for the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), Statement of the IGF Dynamic Coalition on an Internet Bill of Rights at the IGF consultations in Geneva: (IP Justice), Flash! [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:28 am
On the day of my visit, the topic was executive privilege which included discussion of the Presidential Records Act, United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
Ohio; Cox v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:12 pm
We filed our FOIA request on Oct. 7, 2003 to the Departments of Defense, State, Justice (including the FBI), and the CIA. [read post]
