Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
In other words, if capture by law enforcement or military means offers the government a plausible basis to proceed, it will not use lethal force. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
Oman's brief (this post continues below the document): Ralph Oman's Amicus Curiae Brief in Oracle v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:55 am by assoulineberlowe
“Sticks and stones will break my bones … but words will (also) hurt me (and my survivors)! [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:00 pm by Prashant Reddy
I observe that the patentee has fulfilled its duty to furnish all the information’s required u/s 8. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
What’s telling about the white paper is that it repeats Holder’s speech (or, more likely, Holder repeated the white paper) word-for-word, including the categorical omission of the second Mathews factor [see the spillover paragraph at pp. 5-6.] [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
It is, in other words, no longer sufficient to justify a sanction or any other judicial order restricting one’s artistic or journalistic freedom of expression on the basis that a copyright law provision has been infringed. [read post]