Search for: "nate"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2012, 6:48 am
First, only fully insured plans are subject to the requirement (as Nate breathes a sigh of relief); since most large employers are self-funded, their plans are exempt (well, for as long as HHS Secretary Shecantbeserious agrees). [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 11:51 am
Readers should open up the comments section and read the contribution by Nate Ogden. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 3:02 am
The U.S. government will receive a 79.9 percent equity interest in AIG and has the right to veto the payment of dividends to common and preferred shareholders.What do you think, Nate: Should "Berneke and Paulson [have] looked on in stony indifference" here too? [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:14 am
Here, with proper attribution is the story by Nate Raymond: "Vladimir Drozdoff had just started working at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory when he was asked to investigate why a patent had been denied for what the lab considered a genetics breakthrough. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 10:42 am
– Relational Duties Ben Zipursky, Fordham University School of Law Stephen and Julian Darwall, Yale University Law School and New York University Nate Oman, William & Mary Law School 7 p.m. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:02 pm
. - Nate Hegyi (posted 5:58 p.m.) [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Ninth Circuit Holds Reliance on Problematic State Agency Standard Satisfies NEPA Nick Jimenez, In Brief, Takings Claims and Uniform Wind Farm Siting Regulations: Establishing a Limited Property Interest to Minimize Conflict Nate Johnson, In Brief, Flexible Rulemaking and the Limits of the Alaska Hunters Doctrine Cody McBride, In Brief, Oklahoma v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:43 pm
For all your needs on this subject, we heartily recommend Nate Silver’s Five Thirty Eight Blog. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 7:44 pm
Nate Cavanaugh, a 28-year-old tech entrepreneur who has taken a visible internal role interviewing GSA employees as part of DOGE’s work at the agency, is listed as being paid just over $120,500 per year. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:11 am
Nate can be reached at nfulmer@bdblaw.com or 330.258.6464. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:06 am
’" Nate Silver suggests that Obama should repudiate Lewis, agree that the campaigns should return their focus to the important issues, and challenge McCain to do the same whenever he brings up Bill Ayers. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:20 pm
Photo credits: Nate Davidson, the Historical Marker Database and Wikimedia Commons For more information on John Dickinson see: Charles Janeway Stillé. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:54 am
” Eric Beech and Nate Raymond of Reuters report that “Federal judge rules Obamacare unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:15 am
” Nate Raymond and Jonathan Stempel of Reuters report that “U.S. court upholds Harvard race-based admissions; Supreme Court appeal expected. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
Nate Silver’s Five Thirty Eight blog on The New York Times gives Republican primary projections and so does Larry Sabato’s Crystal Ball in “Romney Set to Dominate Race Through April. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:04 am
Forecasters like Nate Silver get flak if they say a candidate has, say, an 80% chance of winning the election. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 4:34 pm
. - by Nate Hegyi (posted 5:33 p.m.) [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:42 pm
In addition, Professors Ann Bartow, Al Brophy, Jack Chin, Dan Filler, Brett Frischmann, Christine Hurt, Rick Garnett, Greg Lastowka, Orly Lobel, Mike Madison, Nate Oman, Frank Pasquale, Larry Solum, and Fred Yen will also share their thoughts on the topic. [read post]
28 May 2023, 11:15 am
The impeachment, filed Thursday, alleges Paxton made legal decisions to benefit Nate Paul, an Austin real-estate developer who paid for Paxton’s home renovations and employed a woman with whom Paxton had an alleged affair. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:14 am
Here, with proper attribution is the story by Nate Raymond: "Vladimir Drozdoff had just started working at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory when he was asked to investigate why a patent had been denied for what the lab considered a genetics breakthrough. [read post]