Search for: "BULL V US"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
(Canadian Trademark Blog) Affidavit struck: US Trademark decision not to be used as evidence: The Chamberlain Group v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
July 29, Dowling, J.); Vinson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
You are not welcome among us. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
Gelpí • Incoming FBA President / Andrés López • Chapter President-Elect / Manuel Pietrantoni • Immediate Past Chapter President / Carlos Valldejuly • 2013 Convention Committee Member - In The Federal Lawyer, September 2013 issue. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Sustain-a-Bull is Durham's alliance of more than 175 independent local businesses, many of which are retail stores offering unique local items.All of us at Goodson Blogson HQ wish our readers a happy and safe holiday season. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:45 am
— from CareerDiva Sheryl Sandberg wrong on “bossy” ban — from CNN Recline, don’t “Lean In” (Why I hate Sheryl Sandberg) — from The Washington Post’s She The PeopleHere’s the rest of what I read this week: Discrimination The dilemma of writing your own EEOC position statement — from HR Hero Line The EEOC and the FTC Publish Documents Related to Background Checks — from All in a Day’s Work EEOC and FTC Tips on… [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 4:04 am
See Petrillo v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
The Court appears to have applied the standard used in its 1969 Rumer v Evans holding: “‘[d]iscriminations of an unusual character especially require careful consideration. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
The Court appears to have applied the standard used in its 1969 Rumer v Evans holding: “‘[d]iscriminations of an unusual character especially require careful consideration. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:47 pm
• The Commerce Department has released a green paper describing a need for a “Dynamic Privacy Framework,” including a Privacy Policy Office, emphasis on transparency and simplicity of privacy notices, global cooperation and parity in information laws, and a federal security breach notification law, possibly similar to California’s SB 1386 • United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:36 pm
Anyway, planning is already underway for Harpdrygal V, which will propel us to new lows. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
Gaetano v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:30 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 3.- Christopher Bird, TorontoVisit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net TORONTO EMPLOYMENT LAW • TORONTO CIVIL LITIGATION & ESTATE LITIGATION • TORONTO FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:10 pm
• Articles 15 and 16, because the legislation would prevent owners of registered trade marks from enjoying the rights conferred by a trademark; and • Article 20, because plain packaging would constitute an unjustifiable encumbrance on the use of trade marks. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:14 am
• In Michigan, the authorities we created to provide us with safe roads have “no duty” to make sure that traffic lights do not shine green in all four directions, or to replace missing stop signs. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
(China Law Blog) Synchronicity in trademark applications in China: from a first-to-file to a first-to-use to a divination system (IP Dragon) Baby Tricycle Wars: Chinese babygood group victorious against US Mattel: Babygood Group v. [read post]
