Search for: "Branch v. Mays" Results 1681 - 1700 of 5,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
However, the separation of powers doctrine places limitations on what the courts have the authority to review and it has long been held at both the state and federal level that the courts may not investigate the inner workings of other branches of government to determine whether procedural requirements are met. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Marom v Anselmo, 90 AD3d 622, 623), and "may freely consider affidavits submitted by the plaintiff to remedy any defects in the complaint" (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88; see Berman v Christ Apostolic Church Intl. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 3:55 pm by Samantha M. Cira
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (District Court), in the case styled National Small Business Association v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:40 am
An attorney may not recover fees for legal services performed in a negligent manner even where that negligence is not a proximate cause of the client's injury (see Martin, Van de Walle, Guarino & Donohue v Yohay, 149 AD2d 477, 480; Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 148 AD2d 155, 158, affd 76 NY2d 38). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am by Bill Ward
They are appropriately situated in the policy-making branches of government. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
Facts SSUK is the UK branch of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (“SSCS”), an organisation based in the USA. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm by Ken
Gess of the Costa Mesa branch of the firm Snell & Wilmer. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
The State responds that the email met the elements of blackmail, which is not constitutionally protected speech, and may serve as the basis of a criminal conviction.Gerhart v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Lyle Denniston
” – Excerpt from a column by Georgetown Law Center professor Randy Barnett, published on the website SCOTUSblog.com on Thursday, reacting to the Supreme Court decision in King v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:35 am
However, he was not satisfied that a substantial number would assume that the Pets Factor programme was the responsibility of, or otherwise connected to, the X Factor; stating that some may wonder, but that is all, since The X Factor is not known for branching out into other fields. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 10:23 am by Jon
No power delegated is "plenary" within its "sphere", despite the opinion of Justice Marshall in Gibbons v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:39 am by Lawrence Solum
In so doing, the Article offers an innovative theoretical approach, providing guidance to key dilemmas that have been left largely unresolved since the landmark Shelley v. [read post]