Search for: "C. M. v. State"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 6,590
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
First, the relevant legislation consists of Regulations 1308/2013 (Recital 97 and Articles 93 and 103(2)) and 1151/2012 (Recital 32 and Articles 4(b)-(c), 12 and 13). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
His case, Marbury v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am
(c) Thirdly, the Court addressed whether vulnerability test implied some sort of “functionality” requirement. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Because of the limited punishments that can be imposed, "[c]riminal defamation defendants are not entitled to a trial by jury" and "state law does not afford indigent criminal defamation defendants the right to court-appointed counsel. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Disclaimers: not really something to bother with anymore under EU trade mark law Patent-och v Mats Hansson Case C-705/17, CJEU (June 2019) A disclaimer is an odd thing: “it is part of my mark, but please ignore it”. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Aside from cost of healthcare services increasing, insurance premiums have also been affected by the merging of physician practices with hospitals in states like California. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Aside from cost of healthcare services increasing, insurance premiums have also been affected by the merging of physician practices with hospitals in states like California. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
George Thomas is Burnet C. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
Some states have an exception, whereby they allow healthcare clinicians from different professions to be housed together as shareholders within the same professional corporation. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 8:40 am
C|M|LAW’s own Professor Chris Sagers’ new book United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
Part 1 proposes that Section 230(c)(1) would not apply to civil claims based on state law (but apparently not federal law…?) [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am
In M v H, [107] Martha McCarthy, who was then a junior lawyer, bravely took on a case that would make history. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 6:05 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes M&A Contracts: Purposes, Types, Regulation, and Patterns of Practice, and Allocating Risk Through Contract: Evidence from M&A and Policy Implications (discussed on the Forum here), both by John C. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:11 pm
Supreme Court in Luce v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
Grant about the business of book publishing: "plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose" | Invitation for applications for the Shamnad Basheer IP / Trade Fellowship at the Texas A&M University School of Law [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
Beatty, for Educap, Inc., Appellant.Tom M. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
The first such case was decided in 2012 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Humana Medical Plan and Humana Insurance Company v. [read post]
