Search for: "CASH v. UNITED STATES" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-419. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
Your Curmudgeon has just received reliable word that ECUSA and its attorneys intend to ask the United States Supreme Court to review the (interlocutory!) [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 10:51 am
An example of a general legacy is “I give [pounds] 100 to X”: Wood Estate v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The lawsuit charges he “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am by admin
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm by Maddy Carter
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:43 am by Susan Brenner
Historically, an indictment was a charging document returned by a grand jury; this is still true in the United States, which retains the use of the grand jury. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:22 am by Joy Waltemath
United States, which requires the settlement to constitute “a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:40 am by Michelle Kisloff and Arthur Kim
  The subsequent class actions, on behalf of United States customers, were consolidated into the District of Minnesota. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
John Bryan, who once dated Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, has launched a legal action against News Corporation in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
US, No. 06-5301 Dismissal of claim for the return of cash that was seized and forfeited in connection with plaintiff's arrest for violating currency reporting laws is affirmed as the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the claim is barred by sovereign immunity. . .U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, February 27, 2008 U.S. v. [read post]