Search for: "California Employment Law Letter" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
  Governor Jerry Brown actually signed this bill into law when he first served as Governor. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
TrunkDocket: 11-1115Issue(s): Whether the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial in San Diego, California, which includes a Latin cross that is fully integrated among many secular symbols, violates the Establishment Clause.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Center for Constitutional JurisprudenceReply of petitioners Mount Soledad Memorial Association v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:17 pm by Lynberg & Watkins
For more information about compliance with California law, read the DLSE’s April 7, 2010 opinion letter (PDF). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:01 am by admin
That’s why some states, like Massachusetts but unlike California, have a potent inclusionary zoning law that can override local opposition when the locality, as for instance Marin, has a minuscule proportion of affordable housing. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:34 am by Victoria VanBuren
Soledad Canyon High Desert, California Public Lands Conservation and Management Act of 2011. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:54 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
AMICUS CURIAE LETTERS: Arias Ozzello & Gignac LLP Consumer Attorneys of California California Employment Lawyers Association California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO Chavez & Gertler LLP Daniels, Fine, Israel, Schonbuch & Lebovits LLP Desai Law Firm, P.C. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:58 am by Kara M. Maciel
If AB 2103 becomes law, it will become yet another explicit difference from federal law that employers in California will need to adapt to. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:58 am by <a href=''>Kara M. Maciel</a>
If AB 2103 becomes law, it will become yet another explicit difference from federal law that employers in California will need to adapt to. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Letter Carrier Fraud, Delivering the Mail Goes To the Dogs. 2. [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Cascade National also held a license issued by the State of California Department of Insurance to write workers’ compensation insurance policies for coverage in California, subject to the insurance laws and regulations of California. 8. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:22 am by Thomas Kaufman
Harris Cnty., 529 U.S. 576, 588 (2000) (declining to defer to an agency’s interpretation, contained in an opinion letter, of an unambiguous regulation); Auer v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:25 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Markey of Massachusetts, the co-chairman of the Congressional Bipartisan Privacy Caucus, said in a letter sent Wednesday to eight major wireless carriers that he was ‘deeply concerned' that routine tracking of cellphone use by law enforcement officials in many departments ‘may violate the privacy rights of Americans.'” Shutting Down Cell Service During Protests: The Constitutional Dimension [ACLU – Gabe Rottman] Under orders from BART police, the… [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:18 am by Ron Miller
A Department of Labor Standards Enforcement opinion letter explicitly recognized the distinction between the FLSA and California law, and explained the rationale behind it: the desire to protect registered nurses until they are afforded the control and decision-making power they deserve. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Soledad Canyon High Desert, California Public Lands Conservation and Management Act of 2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:20 pm
But Ginsburg says the law had roots in a California effort to require pregnancy or childbirth leave to women: The California law sharply divided women’s rights advocates. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm by russell
But, they are required by law to do so under a United States Supreme Court case, Brady v. [read post]
The legal blogs and Internet newsletters have been full of news of the California Supreme Court's Brinker decision on the interpretation of California's meal period and rest break laws. [read post]