Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 34,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Juarez v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 5:40 pm
WeidemanEarlier today the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Ross v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 10:00 am
AB 2103 (fixed salaries and overtime): This legislation overturns a 2011 California court decision in Arechiga v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 9:03 am
I explain why in my new Cato post on Parker Drilling v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 12:16 pm
This morning we read in the Hollywood Reporter, Esq., about a case in California state court captioned Hirsch Wallerstein Hayum Matlof & Fishman v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:25 am
As courts continue to address whether and when employers can compel employees to arbitrate their wage-hour claims, the California Court of Appeal has issued a decision in Cortez v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:25 am
As courts continue to address whether and when employers can compel employees to arbitrate their wage-hour claims, the California Court of Appeal has issued a decision in Cortez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:43 pm
In Parcell v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:30 am
Mississippi, which will appear in the California Law Review 101 (2013): 445. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:46 pm
KunYesterday, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Coito v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:29 pm
The first change in the law came with the famous New York case n the case MacPherson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
On Wednesday, August 17, 2011, the Labor and Employment Law Section of the State Bar of California will present a full-day seminar entitled "Wage & Hour Class Actions After AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
In Parks v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm
California Supreme Court ruling in Edwards v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:12 am
In other words, expressly referencing procedural mechanisms in your arbitration agreement permitted under California state law is not unconscionable!!!! [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
See, Conley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 9:23 am
On September 16, 2020, the California Supreme Court granted review of Boermeester v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:40 am
In Huff v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 10:35 am
Indeed, the list of California tort law “firsts” is long and varied, including such heavyweights as Summers v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:09 am
I blogged about this at Professor Goldman's Technology and Marketing Law blog: First, a plaintiff took a spam case to trial and was awarded damages: "Plaintiff Wins $7000 Following Bench Trial on Claims Under California Anti-Spam Statute -- Balsam v. [read post]