Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 34,266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:15 pm
The case, See’s Candies, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:06 pm
Kuciemba v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
The Supreme Court has historically permitted the limited use of race-based college admissions programs, beginning 45 years ago in the Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm
The post California Supreme Court Limits Governmental Immunity Statute That California Courts of Appeal Had Read More Broadly first appeared on Renne Public Law Group. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm
Leon v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
” This ruling has raised significant concerns around LGBTQ rights and its ramifications, and there is a broader question of what this may mean for other protected classes as currently protected by California’s public accommodations laws. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:32 am
Czodor v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
" But the court also set forth its own view about the law, rather than just deferring to the district court's view: The district court relied on Doe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
By the time of Rucho v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:23 pm
California, affirmative action was challenged by a would-be student. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm
And other states can follow-suit: California, Illinois, Washington, and so on. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Similarly, while the narrow holding was that the law at issue was unconstitutional because it allowed some nonconsensual recordings -- particularly, body-worn cameras by police officers -- but not others, most state laws contain the same exceptions.So for states -- including California -- with two-party consent statutes, if the opinion stands, I doubt that most of them would survive. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:55 am
Painters & Allied Trades District Council 82 Health Care Fund v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
” Data Privacy and Data Protection On 22 June 2023, the Upper Tribunal confirmed the civil standard of proof applied in information law litigation with the judgment in Doorstep Dispensaree Lts v Information Commissioner [2023] UKUT 123 (AAC). [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 10:14 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
In California v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
The main case permitting racial profiling in law enforcement, Whren v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm
In its discussion of the merits, the opinion begins with a history of the Equal Protection Clause, including the clause’s history in the Court, and, among other things, quotes from the plurality opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
