Search for: "Campbell v. State" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Justice Souter wrote the unanimous 1984 opinion in Campbell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
The Ninth Circuit arguably erred because, while relying on the US Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 US 569 (1994), it overlooked the part of  Campbellin which the majority stated that the defence of fair use may apply to a satire if “there is little or no risk of market substitution [of the original work with the later work], whether because of the large extent of transformation of the earlier work, . . . [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 8:55 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The law is not as clear in Maine, as the state’s highest court has not adopted the Luhrmann standard, and in fact a 2013 Maine Superior Court ruling rejected the standard in Campbell v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm by pfriedman
The proposition that an appropriation must comment on the original to constitute fair use originates in commentary on Campbell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am by Graeme Hall
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 (08 June 2011): No error of law deporting Bangladeshi man convicted of complicity in shooting. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
There were also a number of “preliminary issues trials” and summary judgment applications, in particular: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) (Nicol J). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm by David Walk
Williams, 549 U.S. 346 (2007), and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am by Ben
 The late playwright's son sued del Toro, the Fox Searchlight studio and others in February and Zindel v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm by INFORRM
The Court adopted the description of the Article 8 / 10 balancing exercise given by Lord Hoffmann in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457, at [55] and [56] (a case brought by Naomi Campbell against a newspaper which had published photographs of her leaving a drug treatment session): ‘when press freedom comes into conflict with another interest protected by the law, the question is whether there is a sufficient public interest in that particular… [read post]