Search for: "Cooper v. State"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 7,442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2007, 8:16 am
This disclosure came the same day I sat in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in chilly Cincinnati, where a three-judge panel (Judges Alice Batchelder, Ronald Gilman and Julia Gibbons) heard oral arguments in the ACLU v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:58 pm
Ryals v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:32 pm
United States FAA v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am
AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4-5 December 2019. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
United States and New York v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:53 pm
" United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:40 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
For a copy of the Supreme Court's decision in Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village Tenant's Association v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm
Kennedy, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, this year I also assigned two other readings: a 1998 article co-written by Amy V. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:50 am
The United States also rejects the Trust's reading of United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
The IPKat has learned from a World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) press release that, following a round of discussions by Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) member states within the context of the PCT Working Group, PCT Member States have endorsed a series of recommendations (i) to enhance the Treaty's contribution in improving the quality of granted patents and (ii) to make the international patent system more useful to developing countries. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:21 pm
Crain v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
The law does not require [petitioner] to challenge his conviction at the earliest opportunity, it only requires [petitioner] to have sound reasons for not doing so" (quoting United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Technologists v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
Two things to keep in mind: First, the state are often pretty cooperative in adopting various international standards (see for example Julian Ku's important piece on the subject). [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 2:41 am
Pandozy v. [read post]
