Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 1681 - 1700 of 7,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2011, 5:58 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
This post does not necessarily reflect my thoughts and feelings nor do they represent any views held by Forbes. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:01 am
  The free program Monolingual does an excellent job of removing these that I have never used and won't ever need. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 4:45 am
And the US examiner never specifically considered the argument as I have set it out. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:29 am by Ted Eisenberg
So while I agree that the study provides no significant evidence that an offer increases success, my analysis (obviously incomplete) suggests that the study provides no persuasive evidence that an offer does not increase success. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:17 am
Furthermore, I searched (for about 15 minutes) for a contact form where I could send email to Google support (does that even exist?) [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Including "don't use x until we can figure out who x belongs to," which is not far from this case (though the fact that the seized material has already been reviewed might be a relevant distinction). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:38 am
To understand why, we need to look at the next paragraph of Article X, following the one quoted above. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
An AIPPI Rapid Response Event I WIPO's statistics for 2016: Asia continues to roar I UK UPC ratification still on track despite Article 50 trigger I Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 4:55 am
" If I show up and hand over a gun, I'm implicitly testifying that yes, I have the gun and this gun I'm giving you is in fact the gun I used to kill John X. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:47 am by AZF
Take a patent you’ve ever heard of which ‘does X over the internet’. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:11 am by Leonard
The FDA sites that use of these imaging techniques have much higher radiation doses than standard X-rays, dental X-rays and mammography, potentially increasing the lifetime risk for cancer. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:11 am by Leonard
The FDA sites that use of these imaging techniques have much higher radiation doses than standard X-rays, dental X-rays and mammography, potentially increasing the lifetime risk for cancer. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:47 am by AZF
Take a patent you’ve ever heard of which ‘does X over the internet’. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
As the journalist Jack Hitt later reflected, ‘I remember X-Ray Spex, with that promise of seeing girls naked beneath their clothes, as my first shattering disillusionment with the world of adults and all their horrible lies. [read post]