Search for: "District of Columbia Government, Appeal of" Results 1681 - 1700 of 3,633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm by Lindsay M. Harris
Personally, I Co-Direct the Immigration and Human Rights Clinic at the University of the District of Columbia’s David A. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am by Garen Dodge and Daniel Masakayan*
Nine states, the District of Columbia, and 29 cities and counties now extend these policies to government contractors. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 8:28 am by lburchi@lawbc.com
District Court for the District of Columbia on May 14, 2015, had dismissed the ESA complaint of CBD, the Center for Food Safety, and the Defenders of Wildlife (Conservation Groups), finding that the Conservation Groups’ “Complaint gives rise to an ‘actual controversy as to the validity’ of the FIFRA Registration Order and is therefore governed by that Act’s jurisdictional grant. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
John Stark Reed Readers undoubtedly are aware of the recent outbreak of ransomware incidents and the problems they present. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:18 pm by Alex Potcovaru
  ICYMI: This weekend, on Lawfare Peter Margulies discussed the Ninth Circuit’s dismissal of Hawaii’s appeal of the District Court’s motion denial. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:43 am by Victoria Kwan
On the same day, Roberts made headlines in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, when he told the audience at a District of Columbia Circuit judicial conference that pop-culture references can be an effective way of making a point. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the U.S. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently put the kibosh on the proposed mega merger between health insurance giants Anthem, Inc. and Cigna Corporation, two of the nation’s four largest insurers. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:42 am by Robert Loeb
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the claims, holding that, under D.C. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Justice Stevens agreed with Judge Leventhal from the District of Columbia appeals court. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm by David Kopel
The first methodology was based on the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by PaperStreet Web Design
The following are the fundamental prerequisites for Extra Help: You must be a resident of one of the fifty US states, or the District of Columbia. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 2:48 am by NCC Staff
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia voted unanimously to reverse the decision. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:01 am by Jon Katz
Felonies in the District of Columbia are prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s Office, because the District of Columbia sadly remains a colony of sorts whose citizens do not have full Congressional voting representation, whose laws ordinarily do not go into effect without Congressional review, and whose judges are nominated by the president rather than by the District of Columbia’s mayor. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
Ginsburg’s opinion sides with federal district court review, rejecting the government’s argument that mixed claims be split between a district court and the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:40 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that immigration judges must give immigrants who have been detained bond hearings at least every six months; at the hearing, the immigration judge must order an immigrant’s release unless the government can show convincingly that the immigrant is either a flight risk or a danger to public safety. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am by NCC Staff
Contrary to the Government’s contention, trademarks are private, not government speech,” Alito said. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that immigration judges must give immigrants who have been detained bond hearings at least every six months; at the hearing, the immigration judge must order an immigrant’s release unless the government can show convincingly that the immigrant is either a flight risk or a danger to public safety. [read post]