Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General" Results 1681 - 1700 of 20,992
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
It does not measure a company’s ability or resources to pay the attorneys, accountants, consultants, and internal staff to prepare Form 10-Ks, proxy statements, and other filings or to otherwise comply with the Commission’s disclosure rules. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
DOJ also has not filed a motion for sanctions against the Texas Attorney General for abuse of process. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
NOTICE: These statements and materials are for general informational and purposes only. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To take one example, at the time that the Court decided the leading qualified immunity case of Harlow v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 3:06 pm by Katherine Gallo
On October 20, 2022, the Second District Court of Appeal ruled in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
., the plausibility requirement for complaints under Iqbal v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:52 pm by Ilya Somin
" A better response is that, while the state attorney general may not have the power to order MOHELA to file a lawsuit, that does not change the fact that MOHELA is owned by Missouri, and therefore that financial losses to MOHELA are also losses to the state. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm by Amy Howe
Nebraska and was filed by six states with Republican attorneys general. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:46 pm by Holly
Army Judge Advocate General’s Corp and served as a military prosecutor and defense attorney at Army bases in Virginia, Georgia, Alabama, and Cuba. [read post]
” The previous Anti-Homosexuality Act which infringed on the rights of sexual minorities was declared null and void by Uganda’s Constitutional Court in Professor Oloka-Onyango and Others v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition 8 of 2014). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:54 pm by Kurt R. Karst
§ 503(54)(G) (specifically, telemedicine “being conducted under any other circumstances that the Attorney General and the Secretary have jointly, by regulation, determined to be consistent with effective controls against diversion and otherwise consistent with the public health and safety. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
The first is from the California Attorney General in Rupp v. [read post]