Search for: "Does 1 - 64" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
  A typical invalidated claim includes Claim 1 of Patent No. 5,747,282 which reads “1. [read post]
Notably, according to article 64 (1) EPC, a European patent shall confer on its proprietor, in each Contracting State in respect of which it is granted, the same rights as would be conferred by a national patent granted in that State. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:38 am by The Legal Blog
There can be no manner of doubt that the Evidence Act providing in Section 64 thereof of proof of documents by primary evidence only means proof of the original document. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:48 pm
But the allegedly infringing conduct began with the 3- and 4-inch versions; size does not, here, matter. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:31 am
Mathers, 165 Ariz. 64, 796 P.2d 866 (Arizona Supreme Court 1990).State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:43 am
Mathers, 165 Ariz. 64, 796 P.2d 866 (Arizona Supreme Court 1990).State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
The case was considered by the Moldovan Constitutional Court in  Hotărâre nr.36 din 05.12.2013 privind interpretarea articolului 13 alin. (1) din Constituţie în corelaţie cu Preambulul Constituţiei şi Declaraţia de Independenţă a Republicii Moldova (Sesizările nr. 8b/2013 şi 41b/2013). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
(b) Three states levy mandatory, statewide, local add-on sales taxes at the state level: California (1%), Utah (1.25%), and Virginia (1%). [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
" The majority pointed out that although the Act does not conclusively resolve the issue, it is consistent with processing a 9(e)(1) petition supported by preagreement signatures. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Petitioner further alleges that the transfer was retaliation for the Education Law § 310 appeal that he filed in May 2023 concerning a separate, unrelated matter.[1]  Petitioner additionally asserts that his involuntary transfer violates the terms of the collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) governing his employment with respondents. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Petitioner further alleges that the transfer was retaliation for the Education Law § 310 appeal that he filed in May 2023 concerning a separate, unrelated matter.[1]  Petitioner additionally asserts that his involuntary transfer violates the terms of the collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) governing his employment with respondents. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 8:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The exception to this would be under Section 273(1), which allows for quashing a by-law or resolution for illegality. [read post]