Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 1681 - 1700 of 4,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2018, 11:57 am by Scott R. Flick
  The webinar is at 1 pm ET on March 20th, and you can register for it here. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
This relationship is important, although it does not always hold true. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:17 am by INFORRM
Explanatory Notes are optional for Private Members Bills but Lord Lester’s team have now prepared 41 page Explanatory Notes in order to “assist understanding of the Bill against the background of existing law, and to explain the nature of the changes the Bill seeks to make in reforming the law, and the reasons for those changes” [1]. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:58 am
The AmeriKat recommends that readers watch the hearings here (Peters' testimony, at the 41 minute mark). [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Any law student would recognise some of the famous non-criminal names on the table which led to this mess, obtained by a Conservative MP Philip Davies, whom I debated about this on BBC Radio 5 Live (listen by clicking here, from 1:41:15). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:23 pm by emagraken
Norlander, 2012 BCSC 719 (Master)… [34]         Read together, the above authorities stand for these propositions: 1. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:17 pm
Recently, the CRCICA has brought into force the new Arbitration Rules (the “2011 Rules”) with effect from March 1, 2011, which is based upon the revised UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules of 2010 (with a few adaptations stemming from CRCICA’s position as an arbitral institution and an appointing authority). [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 8:49 am
Even though this situation does not present any cutting-edge legal issues, it does illustrate the typical potential concerns worth exploring before making any termination decision. 1. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 3:45 am by Broc Romanek
Meanwhile, another embattled company - Chesapeake Energy - filed this additional soliciting material that disclosed the release of these two so-called "contextual tweets":- Tweet 1) Fact: 41% of S&P 500 companies have split the Chairman and CEO positions and only 21% have truly independent chairmen [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:35 pm by Gene Takagi
The ad does not name a candidate or a particular political party, but it does encourage voters who are in support of the mass transit project to show their support when electing their next state senator. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 2:39 am
"Where does fiduciary duty lie in this situation? [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 7:10 am by Kelly
What does all of this get us? [read post]