Search for: "Dow Jones "
Results 1681 - 1700
of 1,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2009, 2:44 am
., Fidessa and Dow Jones. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 7:51 pm
(Read the full post at Legal Tech Hub) Seizing the Technology of the Day Before the birth of the World Wide Web, while still cosseted in a print world, librarians “discovered fire” in the form of online databases which were not available to the general public: SDC Orbit (scientific and patent data), Lockheed Dialog ( news, people and business data), Information America (people data) The New York Times Infobank, the Dow Jones News Wire to name a few. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:14 pm
***Akin Gump, DC +, LA +, NY -, SF +/-, SV +Alameda DA +Allen Matkins, LA +, OC +, SF +/-Arnold & Porter, DC +, LA -Baker Botts, DC +Baker McKenzie, DC -, SD -, SF +, SV +Beyer Weaver, Oak+Bingham, W.LA +, SF +, SV +, WC +Boies Schiller, DC +, NY +Bryan Cave, W.LA +, OC +Chadbourne, NY +Chapman Cutler, SF -Cleary, DC +/-, NY +/-Cooley, SD -, SF+/-, SV +/-Covington & Burling, DC +/-, SF +/-Cox Castle, LA +Crowell & Moring, DC +Cravath, NY +Curtis, NY +Davis Polk, NY +/-, SV… [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
The Human Rights Commission also announces — rather triumphantly, I think — that it does not matter that Encyclopedia Dramatica is hosted and written in the United States, because Australian law, as reflected in Dow Jones v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:12 am
The defendants’ grounds for the application to strike out were as follows: That the claim and its real purpose was to circumvent the rule in Derbyshire v Times Newspapers Limited [1993] AC 534 (“Derbyshire”)] which prevents the Governing Body of Durand School, as a governmental body, from suing for libel; That its effect was circumvent the rule which prevents the Governing Body of Durand School, as a public authority and hence a body without Article 8 ECHR rights, from suing for… [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 12:16 pm
Two indexes you are probably familiar with are the Standard & Poor's 500 Index and the Dow Jones Industrial Average. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:10 pm
Of particular significance was that XTO was a relatively large public company that had outperformed its peers in the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:15 am
"Dick Tofel, vice president for corporate communications at Dow Jones, the Journal's publisher, said yesterday, "We said when we published the article that we were confident the article was fair and accurate, and we feel the same way three years later. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 pm
The second basis for the application was the familiar Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946 jurisdiction to stop a claim that doesn’t serve the legitimate purpose of protecting the claimant’s reputation. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:13 am
Just two days ago, Carol Remond from Dow Jones Newswires reported that the SEC subpoenaed Copper River for discovery documents obtained from Overstock.com during its legal battle with the company. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:50 pm
Thus Miss Shevill was able to sue a French publisher in England in respect of the damage to her reputation caused by the 250 copies of France-Soir distributed in England (although these days a claimant in her position would have to surmount the “real and substantial tort” test established in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946). eDate concerned a claim by a German convicted murderer, X, brought in the German courts against the Austrian operator of an internet portal which… [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 4:16 pm
The chief executive of Philadelphia Media Holdings has expressed an interest in buying Wall Street Journal publisher Dow Jones. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 8:36 pm
Location: New York, NY September 16 Sponsor: Hedge Funds Care Event: Cocktails on the Sound Location: Stamford, CT September 16-17 Sponsor: Marcus Evans Event: 2nd Annual Investing in Frontier Markets Location: London September 16-17 Sponsor: FRA Event: Marketing & Advertising Compliance for Investment Advisers Location: New York, NY September 20-22 Sponsor: Infocast Event: Energy OTC Derivatives, Futures & Swaps Summit Location: Washington, DC September 21 Sponsor: Golden… [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:33 am
This stands in contrast to investments like mutual funds, where success or failure is often measured in terms of performance in relation to a stock index, like the Dow Jones Industrial Average. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
For example, will the serious harm test be more onerous than the current need for a tort to be real and substantial, as set out in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75, or the “threshold of seriousness” considered in Cook v Telegraph [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB)? [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
The Defendant pleaded justification, and in mid-2010, applied that an order for service out of the jurisdiction be set aside on the grounds, derived from Jameel (Youssef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc. [2005] QB 946, that the Tweet did not constitute a real and substantial tort within the jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
Representative events include: the Dow Jones Private Equity Advisor’s Conference; the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers – Stetson University Law School’s “White Collar Crime College;” American University’s Washington College of Law Summer Program in International Commercial Arbitration; American Bar Association Construction Law Institute; and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s Basic and Advanced Arbitrator… [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
It relied on four points “(a) [The principle in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946)] … is engaged and there is an obvious and substantial disproportion between the cost of the exercise and conceivable vindication; (b) Google is not a publisher in defamation law of its search engine results web page; (c) …the innocent dissemination defence prescribed by common law and under s 32 of the Defamation Act 2005 is positively engaged; and in any event… [read post]
27 May 2010, 5:30 am
Dow Jones Newswires reported that the president of the organization, Denise Crawford, acknowledges that a 120 day waiting period is too long. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:15 pm
Whether this would be wise will depend on the circumstances, but given that the Tesla case confirms that the principles set out in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946 and Lait v Evening Standard [2011] EWCA Civ 859 apply equally to malicious falsehood claims, there would have to be good reasons for not suing on the original – particularly if your own actions in the interim suggest that you have not suffered any damage. [read post]
