Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 1681 - 1700 of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Adam Wagner
Updated | ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment / press summary / our analysis The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that in cases where a parent is threatened with deportation, the best interests of their child or children must be taken into account, particularly when the children are citizens by virtue of being born in this country. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:07 am by CMS
In this case comment, Richard Bamforth and Laura West from CMS comment on the decision handed down last month in the matter of Micula and others v Romania [2020] UKSC 5. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am by Frank Cranmer
As to the fifth test, however, Mr Cave’s belief in English Nationalism as he described it did not meet it. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:06 am
In Ace European Ltd & 5 ors v (1) Howden Group (2) Howden North America Inc (formerly Howden Buffalo Inc) [2012] EWHC 2427 (Comm), Mr Justice Field upheld his prior order granting permission to the claimant insurers (the Claimants), to serve proceedings seeking declaratory relief, out of the jurisdiction.The Claimants were excess public and products liability insurers of the first Defendant and its subsidiary companies from 1995 to 2002. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 7:37 pm by Samuel Bray
Rodgers, 284 U.S. 521, 529 (1932) ("The equity jurisdiction conferred on inferior courts of the United States by [sec- tion] 11 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 . . . is that of the English court of chancery at the time of the separation of the two countries. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:35 pm by Lawrence Solan
   The defendant denies having said in her native language the equivalent of what the interpreter attributes to her in English, and the court must then decide what to do.In United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:52 am by William Carleton
But it's also a reminder to not expect too much of United States v. [read post]
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]