Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 1681 - 1700 of 7,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2019, 10:26 am
However, it also emphasised that, even though the legalisation of cannabis for therapeutic and recreational purposes is under discussion across the EU, the consumption and use of cannabis containing THC above a stated threshold remains illegal in most EU Member States. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Some Boards indicate that there is such a prohibition but that legitimate interest arises from e.g. broad vs narrow or from a longer term in case of internal priority (and one could also consider new states acceding to the EPC or becoming a new validation state in the priority period). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
  In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
City of Chicago (2010), which applied the Second Amendment to the states. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Qualifications: Applicants must be United States citizens and enrolled in law school at the time of the internship. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am by Jan von Hein
Kieninger: Vedanta v Lungowe: A milestone for human rights litigation in English courts against domestic parent companies and their foreign subsidiary In Vedanta v Lungowe, a case involving serious health and environmental damage due to emissions into local rivers from a copper mine in Sambia, the UK Supreme Court has affirmed the jurisdiction of the English courts, in relation to both the English parent company and the subsidiary in Sambia. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
“The Delaware State Bar Association is set to host a CLE program titled “Delaware and Desegregation: Belton v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:28 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court held that to allow further unrestricted publication by the English media would nevertheless add significantly to the intrusiveness and distress felt by the claimant and his family. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Assistant Secretary of State David R. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Former Playboy model Karen McDougal filed her suit against Fox News in the Supreme Court of the state of New York. [read post]