Search for: "Ed Waters"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
” Since the Court found substantial evidence “support[ed] the Board’s determination that the Westlands CREZ alternative was infeasible due to its lack of proximity and due to its location in Kings and Fresno Counties, and because the land itself was privately owned by Westside Holdings and the Westlands Water District, [it] [did not] need [to]…reach the issue of whether or not substantial evidence supported the Board’s other findings of… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
In an op-ed for the U-T San Diego, Harold Johnson criticizes the Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 1:48 am
(ed.); Nitric Acid and Fertilizer Nitrates; New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1985. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:20 am
BW would have sought out water as a survival instinct. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:35 am
And he suggests that contaminated water might have been a factor. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
We are very pleased to announce Lawfare‘s first e-book, Lawfare on the National Defense Authorization Acts, which is now available in Kindle format on Amazon for $4.99. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:02 am
Looking `defeated’ and with his eyes watering, [Reed] admitted he had viewed child pornography on his computer and had been looking at both adult and child pornography since he was 13 years old (he was 22 at the time). . . . [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
Los Angeles, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm
Some of Samsung's related arguments may not hold much water, but it's too early to tell.Samsng warns that "[a] piecemeal set of 'representative-for-some-patents-but-not-others' stipulations would require the jury to keep track of different sets of representative products for each patent during a fast-paced trial -- again culminating in a convoluted verdict form and potential jury confusion". [read post]
27 May 2013, 3:00 am
There has been the Bill Russell / Ed O’Bannon antitrust suit. [read post]
25 May 2013, 10:12 pm
This being the period of the third anniversary, it is time to check in with Ed again. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:22 am
At the risk of mangling metaphors, the water's still murky and the jury's still out on the fate of Health Savings Accounts [ed: "mangled?!" [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Supposedly, the publishers “fail[ed] to use reasonable care in their undertaking to provide accurate, up-to-date information about [the drugs]. [read post]
15 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Simpson's state habeas appeal has ruled that Simpson "may have one hand free in order to take notes and sip from a water container." [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:57 am
(An example related to my own field is the way in which visual communications technology is bound up in whiteness: Richard Dyer, "Making 'White' People White, in The Social Shaping of Technology, eds. [read post]
14 May 2013, 4:11 am
Consider the recent Wall Street Journal op-ed. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:01 pm
The applicant had filed the appeal after the Examining Division (ED) had refused the application under consideration for lack of novelty and insufficiency of description.Claim 1 before the Board read:1. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:30 pm
So, Food & Water Watch did. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:16 pm
Azcue (ed.) [read post]
