Search for: "French v. French" Results 1681 - 1700 of 5,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
… The CourtKeeping Confident about Cabinet Confidentiality: Ontario v Ontario In Ontario (Attorney General) v Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2024 SCC 4 [Ontario], the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC” or the “Court”) held that the executive branch of the Ontario government was not required to disclose mandate letters sent to Cabinet Ministers because of society’s overriding interest in preserving Cabinet secrecy. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| The new French law targeting “automated image referencing services”: does EU law allow it? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
What a shock it must have been, therefore, for him to be pointedly reminded of his shortcomings by a member of the French government when visiting his home country. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:31 am by Matthias Weller
The court’s answer to this question is in line with its decision in Wiemer & Trachte v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:58 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Mareva orders over foreign land in the Supreme Court of Victoria In Talacko v Talacko [2009] VSC 349, the Supreme Court... [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
The dust has settled on the latest skirmish between Google and the gaggle of Belgian French/German language newspapers represented by the Copiepresse newspaper trade association. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
Thus, without guarantees that authors are actually informed as to the envisaged use of their works and the means at their disposal to prohibit it, it is virtually impossible for them to adopt any position whatsoever as to such use.All this said, a few days ago, the CJEU ruled in another case - Spedidam v INA, C-484/18 - that focused on similar issues to those at the centre of Soulier and Doke, with however the factual difference that: (a) the relevant rightholders are performers, and… [read post]