Search for: "Friday v. Friday" Results 1681 - 1700 of 13,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2015, 7:23 am by Douglas A. Berman
The US Supreme Court on Friday afternoon added a remarkable twist to what had been a small sentencing case, a case which had its (first) SCOTUS oral argument earlier this Term, via this new order: 13-7120 JOHNSON, SAMUEL V. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:02 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The US Supreme Court has issued an orders list after its Friday conference. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
To view our list of petitions to watch at Friday’s conference, click here. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
It’s fist-bump (v.); fist bump (n.) / gray (not grey) / and a 3-m hmmm. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:07 pm
The Supreme Court on Friday released the list of counsel appearing for oral argument in the session that begins next Monday. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:57 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] granted certiorari in six cases [Order List, PDF] Friday afternoon, including the consolidated cases of Munaf v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:06 am by Dan Taglioli
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit [official website] on Friday heard arguments in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 11:41 am by lennyesq
I should have opened my analysis with the following statement: On Friday, the Supreme Court effectively overruled Marbury v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:48 am by Erin Miller
 The respondents’ merits brief is due Friday, July 23 in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
23 Dec 2005, 9:43 am
[JURIST] AP is reporting that new US Department of Justice documents released Friday by the National Archives include a 1985 statement by US Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito [JURIST news archive] that the landmark Roe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
On Friday, the justices will hold their Jan. 22 conference. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:17 pm
On Friday, we noted CAAF's grant of review in United States v. [read post]