Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 76,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
Not the Corporate Good Faith of Disney, Stone v. [read post]
3 Dec 2004, 7:14 am
In White v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
Budéjovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 880; [2012] WLR (D) 190 “Where a longstanding situation of honest concurrent user of the same mark for goods had come about, each user could register its mark, and each could stop third parties from using it, but neither could stop the other. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:13 pm
An excerpt follows: In the paper, the authors outline their views as follows: We conclude, consistent with the Delaware Supreme Court’s recent decision in Stone v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:21 am
Yesterday, administrative law judge (ALJ), Michael Chappell heard arguments in a case that the FTC brought against POM Wonderful, its parent company, Roll International, and the three officers of the companies, “individually as officers of the companies. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
Council v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
linkKylie Minogue v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:30 am
Morrison and the states in Castle Rock v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:19 am
Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners House of Lords “Expenditure on a warehouse which was used for storage of goods which the taxpayer was in the business of importing and selling was not expenditure on an industrial building so as to qualify under section 18 of the Capital Allowances Act 1990. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 9:11 am
Sony Computer Entertainment UK Ltd and Another v Cinram Logistics UK Ltd Court of Appeal “A manufacturer and seller of goods who lost them through the fault of another before he could make delivery and earn the price could recover that price as damages for their loss. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 2:52 am
R (The Electoral Commission) v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court [2009] EWHC 78 (Admin); [2009] WLR(D) 24 “There was no presumption that impermissible donations to a registered political party should be forfeited under s 58(2) of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 unless there were good reasons not to do so. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:32 am
" Gravert v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 6:50 pm
Read the decision at: Suwinski v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:38 am
At present, the only remedy for breaches of good faith is avoidance, which is often inadequate for an insured awaiting payment from its insurer for a loss suffered.The Commission's Insurance Contract Law Issues Paper 6 refers to the decision in Sprung v Royal Insurance (UK) Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep IR 111; [1997] CLC 70 to illustrate the unfairness of the current system. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:38 am
At present, the only remedy for breaches of good faith is avoidance, which is often inadequate for an insured awaiting payment from its insurer for a loss suffered.The Commission's Insurance Contract Law Issues Paper 6 refers to the decision in Sprung v Royal Insurance (UK) Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep IR 111; [1997] CLC 70 to illustrate the unfairness of the current system. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:43 am
" The differences in the marks coupled with the care with which the goods are purchased outweighed the fact that the goods overlap. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:09 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Theft of goods over $1,000 Appellant, Anthony Edwards, appeals from two sets of convictions for theft of goods valued over $1,000.00 arising from two separate jury trials in the Circuit Court for Prince Geor ge’s County. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:48 am
Acting in good faith on that information the officers arrest the person and find contraband. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 10:17 pm
Links to briefs in Danforth v. [read post]
