Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 1681 - 1700 of 6,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
, Kavanaugh joined an opinion holding that a police reserve officer’s emails to his superiors, in which he cc’d his co-workers, were not protected under the balancing test adopted by the Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:46 am by MBettman
Powell concurred, the Twelfth District Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Cora Bell. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
” Don’t Overlook BCL § 1104 (c) I can’t say why the parties in Balkind structured their ownership and control rights the way they did, where the one shareholder’s superior ownership percentage conveyed absolutely no superior voting or control rights. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 8:55 am by Mark Ashton
The Pennsylvania Court heard the case and granted the reduction to $1,000. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
One week ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
Credit: Federal Circuit (what it looks like to argue there) One week ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 7:39 pm by Scott McKeown
The decision tracks my November prediction that the Court would follow its reasoning in Ultratec, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of DEI Films v Tiwari 2018 ONSC 4423 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action under Ontario’s anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
As per the employee’s position in litigation, the Court granted him a 30 month notice period. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:57 am by CMS
Citing Canada Trust v Stolzenberg (No 2) [1998] 1 W.L.R. 658 and Bols Distrilleries v Superior Yacht Services [2006] UKPC 56, [2007] 1 W.L.R. 12, the court found in favour of the claimant and decided that the Oak Liability had been transferred to Novo Banco, which had thereby become bound by the English jurisdiction clause in the Facility Agreement and as a result, the English courts had jurisdiction under article 25 of the Judgments Regulation to… [read post]