Search for: "Grant v. Walls"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,983
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2013, 11:39 am
” Other coverage of, and commentary on, yesterday’s grant in Wood v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 6:57 am
Div. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
We call that throw-it-against-the-wall-and-see-if-something-sticks pleading. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 2:52 pm
Illinois Emcasco Insurance Company v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Kaplan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am
Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, in which the Court granted review to consider whether disparate impact claims are available under the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 6:32 am
During a team meeting, the employee noticed that a wall clock had stopped and that his cell phone had also stopped working that morning. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
And in Stanton v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
” It’s like this: Plaintiff Richard Diaz, of Enterprise, Alabama, owns a trademark registration for this mark: Diaz sued Glen Plaid, LLC for trademark infringement for using this elephant design: The wrinkle is that Glen Plaid’s use of the elephant logo is pursuant to a license granted by the University of Alabama as part of Alabama’s “Houndstooth Program. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the local government in Town of Greece v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 1:01 pm
The district court granted the EEOC’s motion. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:39 am
Amazon; La Court v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
Window or wall air-conditioning units shall be considered personal property. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:58 am
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Paul Sherman urges the Court to grant cert. in Worley v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 11:03 am
The recent Cadbury v Nestlé battle over the colour purple [noted by the IPKat here] is just one high profile example of the difficulties that can be encountered. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm
"Nor can an injunction be granted to restrain the publication of a libel." [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am
He noted that the Fourth Amendment requires, but the OFCCP has not adopted, the Fourth Amendment procedural protections of: subpoenas for contractor objections to off-site investigations, as required by the High Court’s 1946 decision in Oklahoma Press Pub Co v Walling (10 LC ¶51,222), and warrants for contractor objections to on-site investigations, as required by Supreme Court’s 1978 ruling in Marshall v Barlow’s Inc (436 U.S. 307). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:54 am
She cited Phillips v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 8:45 am
Levin (Dkt No 12-872) as “improvidently granted. [read post]
