Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 7:04 am
Officiating round two of a dispute over Kmart’s alleged failure to provide “suitable seating” to cashiers in the national retailer’s California stores, a federal judge certified only a narrow class of employees, limited to the store at which the named plaintiff worked, in their suit alleging violations of a state wage order (Delbridge v Kmart Corp, June 11, 2013, Alsup, W). [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:11 am
Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Adopting this line of reasoning threatens to turn the right of publicity on its head. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm
He died in California after a short illness. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm
Superior Court will be heading to the California Supreme Court, where a quartet of cases raising the same question are already pending. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This has been clear since the Court declared in Brown v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm
Such a head-scratching, impractical rule cannot be reconciled with the United States Supreme Court’s class action decisions in cases such as Wal-Mart v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am
My psychiatrist brother-in-law quipped once that in medical school they teach that 3/4s of what is wrong with a person is in their heads...The authors of DSM-V seem to have good intentions.Dr. [read post]
27 May 2013, 3:00 am
The case essentially involved a head-to-head clash between First Amendment freedom of speech and state law publicity rights. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
When respondent pointed the gun at Zavala, it was only inches from her head. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:01 am
Lerner, who heads the IRS’s tax-exemption division, described the targeting campaign as a misguided attempt to deal with a wave of applications after the 2010 Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/9jDhrh5Fra -> Bell must justify Astral takeover, CRTC says http://t.co/cSpwqtFg6K -> Anton Pillar orders reviewed in XY, LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/9jDhrh5Fra -> Bell must justify Astral takeover, CRTC says http://t.co/cSpwqtFg6K -> Anton Pillar orders reviewed in XY, LLC v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:25 am
In Pindra Hall v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 11:35 am
In an opinion that the medical marijuana community has long been waiting for, the California Supreme Court held in City of Riverside v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
The Hughes Court certainly seemed to head toward a general rule that states must make reasonable efforts to appoint (and thereby pay) counsel for the indigent.Yet, in Avery v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 11:00 am
This question is very much on our minds these days after the GPS case from last term — United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions France: The head of the publisher of France’s Closer magazine and a photographer are under formal investigation for invasion of privacy, following the publication of pictures showing the Duchess of Cambridge sunbathing, according to the BBC. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
Last week we invited Cathy Gellis to guest-post her observations of a hearing in AF Holdings v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
Last week we invited Cathy Gellis to guest-post her observations of a hearing in AF Holdings v. [read post]
