Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 11:09 am
Su Bin was residing in China when the complaint was filed and consented to be conveyed to the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:39 pm
For example, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has meanwhile rejected one of the asserted patent claims. [read post]
29 May 2015, 12:49 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
David Bosco outlined the options that the United States has for responding to ICC scrutiny in Afghanistan and J. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
Holder. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 11:33 pm
("MERS"), Defendants.Civil Action H-17-239.United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 10:21 am
Ass'n v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
United States as though it alleged knowing use of perjury, when it actually alleged withholding exculpatory evidence, warrants reversal. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
Sure, prior to Shady Grove, some federal courts have looked to state law (e.g., Iorio v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:18 am
That is, the Panel noted that the use or absence of punctuation did not alter the fact that a name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark, a position that is consistent with United States court decisions dealing with trademarks. [read post]
“No License, No Problem” – Is Qualcomm’s Ninth Circuit Antitrust Victory a Patent Exhaustion Defeat?
1 Sep 2020, 7:35 am
United States, 273 U.S. 236, 241 (1927), “No formal granting of a license is necessary in order to give it effect. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 1:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Holder (1964) 379 US 104, 118. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 6:10 am
Here is the abstract: In the recent case of Holder v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:46 am
Zeneca and ICI agreed to: (1) pay Barr $21 million; (2) pay Barr’s supplier $35.9 million; and (3) supply Barr with Zeneca-manufactured tamoxifen for resale in the United States at a high royalty rate. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:41 am
, United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am
On the occasion of today's iPhone 5 presentation, I'm now going to explain why it's highly unlikely that sales of Apple's new smartphone will be disrupted by any patent holder in the coming months. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]