Search for: "Holding v. State" Results 1681 - 1700 of 63,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2007, 10:49 pm
City of Healdsburg, 496 F.3d 993, 999-1000 (9th Cir.2007) (" River Watch II");FN12 United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 2:41 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that Section 2802 of the Labor Code, which requires employers to reimburse employees for their reasonable on-the-job expenses, doesn't apply to state employees, including faculty at public universities.There are other ways, of course, in which teaching at a public university is superior; in particular, in the protections afforded by the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause, which apply in public schools but substantially less so in private… [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Supreme Court allows tortured Tamil asylum-seeker’s appeal KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 10 (6 March 2019) In a recent judgment given by Lord Wilson the Supreme Court unanimously allowed KV’s appeal, remitting the matter to the UT for fresh determination. [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
PalTalk Heads to the Federal Circuit PalTalk Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:44 am by CivPro Blogger
Harris, holding that the Federal Meat Inspection Act preempts a California state statute that regulated the ability of slaughterhouses to buy, sell, or receive a nonambulatory... [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 7:06 pm
I confess I lost interest in the United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:25 am by Immigration Prof
Yesterday's petition of the day on SCOTUSBlog was Maslenjak v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:06 am by laborprof lpb
Although the United States Supreme Court expressly decided not to weigh in on the issue in Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:52 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Goertz, holding that the statute of limitations for a section 1983 claim begins running at the conclusion of state court proceedings. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:55 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce in favor of a narrow statutory holding stating that video-on-demand is... [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:06 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 11:31 am by Jeremy Telman
The issue is: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, that a reference to state law... [read post]