Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 7,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2021, 6:01 am
In short, Barnette affirms that, if there is any "fixed star" under the First Amendment, it is that government officials—including public school officials—may not engage in viewpoint discrimination. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:37 am
The Court noted Appellant was re-arguing the facts. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:27 am
” In a twist of irony, the law professor in President Obama may have the right assertion—vibrant democracy requires sunlight so that individual officials do not get to make their own, private decisions about how our public laws operate—tethered to the wrong object. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:19 am
In short, they predict ominously, upholding the lower court’s decision “would transform the judiciary into a Ministry of Truth for every public official in the nation. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
They're going to say, 'Let's make a deal.' They're feeling a lot of pain right now. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
A newspaper’s investigation found the state’s public universities alone spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on gifts for public officials from 2015 to 2018, including more than $200,000 in free sports tickets. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:08 am
While the court’s decision may send a signal to government employees that they are free to proceed with FCA actions, there are some important limitations identified in the decision. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
”[3] The question presented before the Supreme Court is “[w]hether the refusal to register a mark under Section 1052(c) violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:14 am
" It was given an "official" citation when it is issued. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 8:43 pm
In the weeks leading up to the 91st anniversary of the judgment, two students and I had an occasion to re-read the iconic case of the SS Lotus (France v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
The House of Lords yesterday ruled that Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabian officials were both immune from civil suit, even though the tort alleged was torture: Jones v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:33 am
As Dan previewed last week, Prawfs is officially launching today a new feature, the “Law Review Review. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:34 am
Of course, we’re not at all surprised! [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 2:46 pm
Merritt, a Republican and a Certified Public Accountant, wasn't looking to change policy -- he was hoping to assess how taxpayers' resources are used. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:50 am
" In addition, as detailed at this official page, President Obama has already acted on abortion issues, ethics issues and GITMO/terror war issues. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
This decision compromises the sovereignty of our state and violates its public policy. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 4:57 am
Kurian instructing officials to clear pending opposition decisions by the end of March 2009, the Indian Patent Office decided and published number of opposition decisions, both pre- and post-grant. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Il doit plutôt rechercher si cette recommandation est contraire à l’intérêt public ou déconsidère l’administration de la justice. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Cir. 2021); In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 96 (D.C. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 6:27 am
We're gasping for breath right now.So I offer a proposition. [read post]
