Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State" Results 1681 - 1700 of 11,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2023, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
Few defendants appear in court, so plaintiffs move for default judgment and collect what funds they can. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
I had an administrative hearing before the State Division of Human Rights a few years ago where the employer invoked the Fifth Amendment during the entirety of his cross-examination. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:02 am by Venkat
This is a crazy case involving Christopher Stone, “an aspiring lawyer in his 30’s,” and Alyssa Backlund, who in 2010 was a teenager (it also involves Gawker tangentially; we’ve posted about a few cases involving Gawker, most recently Redmond v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We've been doing some research in anticipation of the upcoming ALI meeting at which the Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation will be voted on (we hope ALI members interested in class actions and the like will come out, debate the issues, and vote), and in the spirit of cross-fertilization, we thought we'd share it with our readers. [read post]
26 Mar 2006, 10:23 am by Jeff
If it really is all about the best interests of the child, then abortion would need to be prohibited in all but a few extreme cases. 3. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
(United States v Desmond (1982) 670 Fed. 2nd 414, 420)How great to start off w/a nice hook, then cite Bryan Garner, and then finish strong with Judge Aldisert. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:03 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
Chief Judge Sutton issued an interesting concurrance today, in his own majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
 Nicola tells all.* Can the State automatically acquire ownership of your copyright? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm by Mark Graber
 The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christine Hurt
  Well, according to the facts alleged in the complaint, there's a lot more there to hang one's partnership hat on than in Holmes v. [read post]