Search for: "In Interest of Ac"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm
He is Co-Chair of the ACS Chicago Lawyer Chapter. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:25 am
It is about time that their operation received some scrutiny as providers of accommodation.And, yes, there is an obvious reason for my interest in this topic. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:00 am
– to receive interesting posts drawn from the Law Library of Congress’s vast collections and our staff’s expertise in U.S., foreign, and international law. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 10:31 am
One provision of the Accelerating Charitable Efforts (ACE) Act regarding private foundation distributions to donor advised funds may also be passed due to the Administration’s support. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
Would have been nice if they could have pushed up the date of the opinion a couple of days to 6/24, Blakely's third birthday.)Here's the language from Sanders:[F]aced with two Class B felony convictions, Sanders was susceptible to a potential maximum sentence of forty years (consecutive twenty-year sentences for both counts). [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 10:23 am
ACS has a neat post about the religious beliefs of each one of the founders. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:45 pm
Only the tenant or someone acting on behalf of the tenant with the legal authority to do so (an attorney or a person / deputy appointed by the Court of Protection) can void a tenancy by showing that at the time the tenancy was taken on, the tenant did not have the capacity to make the decision and the arrangement was not in their best interests, When the tenancy is voided the tenant is no longer bound by the terms of the contract. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am
The appeal considered whether this is the case, and if, on this basis, the statutory provisions should be declared incompatible with the ECHR, and the House of Lords decision in R (Clift) v SSHD [2007] 1 AC 484 should be departed from. [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:04 am
” This principle was then fleshed out in Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 AC 321 : …the courts and Parliament are both astute to recognise their respective constitutional roles. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 6:05 pm
Despite this the Republicans have had an ace-in-the-hole- the President's ability to nominate justices to the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Following Dickson v UK (App No 44362/04), (2008) 46 EHRR 927 irrespective of whether the suggested obligation was positive of negative, the core issue was whether a fair balance had been struck between the competing interests [27] and [126]. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
RBK&C conceded that if a need for assistance was found then there would be a potential breach, following R (Limbuela) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Some orders have been made on foot of the Defamation Act, 2009 (also here) – see, for example, Lowry v Smyth (background here and here; coverage of the order here), Mellon v Associated Newspapers (coverage here), and Meegan v Associated Newspapers (coverage here) – but Watters v Independent Star [2010] IECC 1 (03 November 2010) remains the only reported judgment on provisions of the Act. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 7:29 am
Whilst this case was limited to the issue of jurisdiction, Lord Briggs made a number of interesting comments on the substantive issue of parent company liability which will be before the court for determination when this matter eventually goes to trial. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
Of interest on this score is that the maj [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:26 pm
Esto lo señalaron Marcelo Alegre, acá, y un tal Ronald Dworkin, acá, diciendo que las corporaciones son ficciones legales y no tienen "opinión". [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
Following Dickson v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 927, irrespective of whether the suggested obligation was positive of negative, the core issue was whether a fair balance had been struck between the competing interests [27] and [126]. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The Defendant was therefore found to have invited an inference of bad reputation derived from other damaging publications, contrary to the rule in Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
RBK&C conceded that if a need for assistance was found then there would be a potential breach, following R (Limbuela) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The Judge noted ([110]) that these included the protection of human autonomy and dignity (see Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 [51]). [read post]
