Search for: "In Re CAL" Results 1681 - 1700 of 5,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
You're sending a message to the jury, whether you intend to send that message or not. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 11:11 am
So no credit for pretrial custody.I'm sure you'll think about that next time you're deciding what life choices to make. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:51 am
  Seems to me that you could go over the laws of the various states about front versus rear license plates in five minutes or so when you're training someone about the other traffic laws they need to know. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:33 pm
Then, just for fun, steal $20 out of her bra, as well as, once you're in the midst of this whole process, kidnap her in order to get an extra $700 that you realize she has at her grandmother's house?! [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:55 pm
  That way you're technically eligible for parole. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 11:25 am
And the Court of Appeal reversed, and compelled the matter to be arbitrated.All of this, as you might imagine, took years and years: We're talking way back in 2004 and 2005. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:22 pm
Plus, it's also worth mention that, next time you want to get a friend (or an enemy) busted -- or merely harassed -- it'll be sufficient simply to call in an anonymous report that they're weaving all over the road. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:50 pm
  She's giving weekly updates to everyone at corporate about the few individuals who haven't signed, and says that while there's a few individual stragglers (and identifies them by name), they're low level people, and they'll be signed up soon. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:48 am
So now Ebaniz gets a new trial on those as well.Sometimes, when you're a DA, you've gotta leave well enough alone. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 12:26 pm
And I believe that that would put him in a situation where he would be more sympathetic towards a defendant, even though there's a jury instruction right on point that they're not supposed to take into consideration sympathy for a defendant. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
And we're talking about constitutionally protected rights here; the right to attend trials, to voluntarily testify, to file civil actions, etc. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:01 pm
But short of having charges against you dismissed, which was assuredly Saathoff's hope, it's still not a bad day to wake up to a pro-defendant interpretation of the criminal statute you're charged with violating and to see the charges against all of your high-profile co-defendants dismissed. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:11 pm
One Ninth Circuit opinion about dolphin-safe tuna and a dispute regarding exactly how safe we're talking. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:13 am
Since the DA's Office filed the appeal, rather than merely refiling, they're now barred from refiling the charges against the defendant. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:03 am
  Previously, the Court of Appeal had held that since the policy behind CCP 998 is to encourage settlement, we're not going to be too picky about the details. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:02 pm
But that's just my thought.)You're not going to win that many cases as a pro per. [read post]