Search for: "In re: AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
Over the weekend, Jack, Ryan Goodman, and Steve Vladeck published an op-ed in the Washington Post outlining “five principles that should govern any U.S. authorization of force. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
" I thought it would be fun, therefore, to (re?) [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
We’re still trying to figure out the Court’s practice of “rescheduling” cases (i.e., deciding before the scheduled Conference date to move the case to another Conference). [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:28 am
We’re trying to restore the student-athlete principle that UNC’s really been for so long in the forefront of. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
The event, co-hosted by the Yale Federalist Society and American Constitution Society, was moderated by Linda Greenhouse, and they packed the room. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:30 am
”); In re A.P. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Below you’ll find a recap of yesterday morning’s argument in Klayman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:01 am
Until then, Murphy Oil re-confirms that the Board will continue to aggressively pursue Section 7 collective action rights for employees when employers compel individual arbitration. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:11 am
One doesn't cite them in polite company for anything other than the abstract legal principle (from Korematsu) that courts must strictly scrutinize facially racial laws and executive actions. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
Nor do we need to re-litigate the Sony v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 2:24 pm
I can't tell them to tell the truth at the moment because we're seeing so much irrational behavior,” he stated. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:27 am
(e) The Decision endorses an Anglo-American type jury! [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
The Court of Appeals therefore “re-aff [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
One reason for that is that the U.S. does not actually hew consistently to the so-called American Rule; across wide areas of litigation, including civil rights suits, it follows “one-way shift” principles in which prevailing plaintiffs but not prevailing defendants are entitled to fees, and whose encouragement to litigation is greater than either the American Rule or the loser-pays principle. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:36 am
Americans want to think of ourselves as a principled lot, loving all our patriotic platitudes and all, but there’s that part of us that sees nothing wrong with one of our own taking one for the team. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
In the Anglo-American context, the Magna Carta of 1215 was a seminal document, emphasizing the importance of the independence of the judiciary and the role of judicial process as fundamental characteristics of the rule of law. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm
While we’re not fans of the doctrine here at EFF, what the government is trying to do with it in this case is truly breathtaking. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Evident from usual surveys that courts accept that courts don’t really know what they’re trying to measure. [read post]
