Search for: "In re: Davis v."
Results 1681 - 1700
of 1,772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But his list would be a remarkable beginning: (1) Eliminate gerrymandered Congressional districts (which could be done with lawsuits); (2) End the Senate’s dysfunctional filibuster rules (which should have been done earlier, but Democrats got suckered again by Republicans); (3) Adjust corrupt lobbying laws that now unduly favor former members of Congress working for special interests; (4) Aggressively test and re-test the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling (Democrats… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
The AmeriKat was interested to note that this year USPTO Director David Kappos gave a Commencement address at UC-Davis's College of Engineering graduation (picture, left - David Kappos giving his speech). [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm
(77) Malcom Floyd: If V-Jax ends up on a 10 game hold out or being traded to Seattle, Floyd becomes Rivers # 1 WR. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am
They’re often difficult to influence (not unlike physicians)! [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 7:20 am
July I learn of a consumer group looking to take action on illegal agents fees to tenants, the Supreme Court give their decision in the case of Kumarasamy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
Gary Davis from Ireland, perhaps a tad controversially for a data protection deputy commissioner, noted that there seemed to be emerging agreement on trading personal data for free web 2.0 services, but the question was, how much data was too much data; and Bruce Schneier (no link needed!) [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert In the Oracle v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 2:30 pm
Thomas Small in In re Donald, 343 B.R. 524 (Bankr. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Windows MS Office opinion: Mac Office 2008 sucks v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
“Because we knew those rights are already gone, they’re with Spielberg, and secondly we found a way to do it where we didn’t have to ask for permission, because with those rights came a certain collaboration. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
We’re much more than that. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Davis. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Bill 1X 26; see also Professional Engineers in California Government v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Res. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Res. [read post]
