Search for: "In re D. W." Results 1681 - 1700 of 4,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2016, 10:07 am by Eugene Volokh
(If you’re interested, you can read the cert. petition, the brief in opposition and the reply by clicking on “Documents” here; you can also read an amicus brief, which I wrote on behalf of nine law professors, including myself, here.) 1. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:54 pm by Kerry Sheehan
That bill was re-introduced again in 2015, this time seeking to nullify the FCC’s Open Internet Order and prevent the agency from re-issuing the same or similar rule, unless authorized by Congress. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:11 pm
Or will we find ourselves worse off and wishing we could say, “You’re fired”? [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
 Our full blog about Re W (Adoption: Contact) and the astute focus of the BBC Online report is here. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am by Randy Barnett
Rejecting stare decisis when previous decisions conflict with the Constitution does not mean rejecting res judicata. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
W/in national system, use has to be w/in country. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Elizabeth Grimm Arsenault
One of the enabling factors for the abuses committed in the early years of the George W. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Appellant’s argument that the site was an unhealthy place to live was off-point; rather, “[w]hat must be analyzed under CEQA is “a project’s potentially significant exacerbating effects on existing environmental hazards[.] [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Varian reviewed the [w]ill, he recommended that it be redone and that Nella also sign a [p]ower of [a]ttorney and [a]dvance [d]irective. [read post]